Paulina Grnarova CEO & Co-Founder at DeepJudge

We are excited to announce a partnership with Thomson Reuters, the global leader in content-driven technology for legal professionals.

Today, I’m proud to announce our partnership with Thomson Reuters (TSX/Nasdaq: TRI), the global leader in content-driven technology for legal professionals. This collaboration will bring our AI-powered enterprise search to law firms and legal departments through Thomson Reuters’ trusted legal platforms and expansive customer network.

Click for the full announcement.


In trust-heavy domains, “mostly right” isn’t good enough.

Orbital’s CTO @Andrew Thompson sat down with @Sanchit Dhote, Principal at Outward VC, to share what it really takes to build AI workflows in one of the most trust-sensitive domains: real estate due diligence.

orbital

They talk about:
▪️ Andrew’s move into legaltech
▪️ What it truly means to ship early and often in a regulated, trust-heavy market
▪️ The operating principles that keep product, engineering, and commercial reality in lockstep

Following Orbital’s $60M Series B, it was a timely moment to reflect with one of their long-standing investors. Outward has backed Orbital since 2020, and this conversation captures the long-term thinking and domain focus behind how we build product at scale.

Find more: https://outwardvc.com/articles/in-conversation-with-orbital-cto-andrew-thompson/

#Orbital


Redaction and anonymization are often used interchangeably in legal environments. But while they may seem similar on the surface, the difference between them has a significant impact on how legal teams can use their data.

Understanding this distinction is becoming increasingly important as legal workflows evolve and AI adoption accelerates.

nymiz

When Redaction Falls Short

Redaction is typically used to remove or obscure sensitive information from documents before sharing or review. While it plays an important role in certain contexts, redaction alone presents clear limitations:

  • It permanently removes information, reducing context and meaning
  • It breaks data consistency across documents
  • It limits the ability to reuse data for analytics or AI
  • It often relies on manual processes, increasing the risk of errors

For legal teams looking to collaborate, analyze data, or enable AI-driven workflows, redaction quickly becomes a bottleneck.

What Anonymization Enables

Nymiz anonymization takes a fundamentally different approach. Instead of simply removing sensitive information, anonymization transforms it in a structured and consistent way, allowing documents and datasets to remain usable.

When applied correctly, anonymization enables legal teams to:

  • Preserve relationships, patterns, and context within documents
  • Reuse data securely across workflows and teams
  • Support analytics and AI initiatives using real data
  • Reduce exposure without destroying data value

At scale, our anonymization offers approximately 85% accuracy in real-world environments, even across large document volumes and multilingual datasets spanning more than 200 languages, something manual redaction cannot realistically achieve.

Why the Difference Matters for Legal AI

AI systems rely on patterns, consistency, and context. Redacted datasets often lack the structure needed to produce reliable results, while properly anonymized data retains the signals that AI depends on.

As a result, legal teams that rely solely on redaction may struggle to scale AI initiatives, while those that adopt anonymization can move forward with greater confidence and accuracy.

Moving Beyond One-Size-Fits-All Approaches

At Nymiz, we help legal teams determine when redaction is appropriate and when anonymization is the better choice, and we automate both where possible.

Our technology:

  • Identifies personal and sensitive data using advanced NLP and AI models
  • Applies context-aware anonymization or redaction based on use case
  • Ensures consistency across large document volumes
  • Preserves legal structure and meaning where it matters most

This allows legal teams to protect data without compromising their ability to work with it.

Let’s Talk About What Your Workflows Really Need

During Legalweek 2026, we’re having conversations with legal and security leaders about how to move beyond basic redaction toward privacy strategies that actually support modern legal work.

If you’re attending and want to explore how anonymization can unlock secure collaboration, analytics, and AI, while still meeting regulatory requirements, we’d love to talk.

Join Us at Legalweek 2026

We’re meeting with legal and security leaders during Legalweek to discuss how privacy-first collaboration can scale without adding friction or risk.

Schedule a meeting with our team before Legalweek to make the most of your time in New York.

And if you’re onsite, you’ll find us at Booth 612.


How Am Law 100 firm Vinson & Elkins streamlined high-volume real estate work with Orbital, AI purpose-built for real estate law.

https://www.orbital.tech/blog/how-real-estate-ai-reshaped-vinson-elkins-workflow

orbital


In 2026, the legal industry is undergoing a profound transformation driven by artificial intelligence, hybrid work models, and escalating client expectations for speed, transparency, and security. Law firms, in particular, find themselves at a crossroads: continue struggling with fragmented document management that drains resources and limits growth, or adopt a unified, intelligent platform that leverages their existing technology investments. Epona,the M365-native document management system built on SharePoint Online, emerges as the superior solution for consolidating data silos and positioning firms for long-term success.

Epona eliminates the need for third-party hosting, custom connectors, or complex migrations. Instead, it seamlessly extends your Microsoft 365 tenant into a robust, matter-centric DMS that centralizes emails, documents, matters, precedents, contracts, and correspondence in one secure location. This consolidation unlocks the full potential of Microsoft Copilot, enabling AI-powered workflows that automate routine tasks, enhance decision-making, and free attorneys to focus on high-value strategic work. The result is not just operational efficiency, it’s a competitive advantage that drives profitability, improves client retention, and future-proofs your practice in an increasingly AI-centric legal landscape.

epona

Click for the full whitepaper.


Seyfarth Shaw LLP is an Am Law 100 firm with more than 1,000 lawyers across 17 offices. Innovation has long defined the firm’s approach. Through initiatives like Seyfarth Labs, one of the first in-house incubators in the legal industry, Seyfarth has built a reputation for rethinking how legal services are delivered to achieve better outcomes for clients.

The Real Estate Challenge

Seyfarth’s real estate department is among the five largest in the United States. The team advises institutional owners, major developers and national retailers in multi-million- and billion-dollar transactions across the U.S. Their work is both high-volume and high-stakes, requiring attorneys to analyze and interpret complex title, survey, and lease documents with absolute precision.

Given this complexity, the real estate group at Seyfarth is selective about the technology it adopts.

Byong K. Kim, Seyfarth’s Chief Data & Al Officer, recognized that challenge as an opportunity to show where Al could deliver real impact. His Al strategy is to focus on practical applications that deliver genuine value to lawyers and clients alike.

Click for the full case study.


Collaboration is now a core part of legal work. Legal teams routinely share sensitive data with internal stakeholders, external counsel, service providers, and increasingly, AI-powered tools.

Yet every new collaboration point introduces a familiar concern: How do we share legal data without exposing confidential or personal information?

For many legal organizations, this tension between collaboration and control has become one of the biggest operational challenges.

nymiz

When Sharing Data Increases Risk

Traditional approaches to protecting legal data often rely on restricting access or manually redacting documents before sharing them. While these methods may reduce exposure, they also slow down collaboration and introduce inconsistencies.

In practice, legal teams face:

  • Delays caused by manual preparation of documents
  • Increased risk of human error
  • Limited visibility once data leaves the original system
  • Fragmented controls across teams and vendors

As collaboration expands, these limitations become increasingly difficult to manage.

Enabling Secure Collaboration by Design

Nymiz helps legal teams collaborate securely by ensuring that sensitive data is protected before it is shared, not after.

By applying automated anonymization and redaction at the infrastructure level, Nymiz allows organizations to create privacy-safe versions of legal data that can be confidently reused across workflows.

Key capabilities include:

  • Automated identification and transformation of personal and sensitive data across large document volumes
  • Consistent anonymization, ensuring entities remain recognizable without exposing identities
  • Secure data reuse across internal teams, vendors, and AI tools
  • Deployment flexibility (SaaS, API, or on-premise) to integrate seamlessly with existing legal environments

By automating anonymization before data is shared, legal teams can significantly reduce preparation time (often saving up to 80% of the time compared to manual processes) while working seamlessly across multiple formats such as documents, presentations, text files and images.

Supporting Modern Legal Workflows

With privacy built into the data lifecycle, legal teams can:

  • Share data faster and more confidently
  • Reduce friction between legal, compliance, and innovation teams
  • Maintain control over sensitive information beyond organizational boundaries
  • Support AI and analytics initiatives without increasing exposure

Rather than limiting collaboration, privacy becomes the mechanism that makes it possible.

Join Us at Legalweek 2026

We’re meeting with legal and security leaders during Legalweek to discuss how privacy-first collaboration can scale without adding friction or risk.

Schedule a meeting with our team before Legalweek to make the most of your time in New York.

And if you’re onsite, you’ll find us at Booth 612.

 


elevate

The legal tech conversation has changed noticeably over the last year. In 2024 and early 2025, most teams were experimenting. They were testing generative AI tools, piloting point solutions, and exploring what might be possible. As 2026 begins, the questions have become more practical: Does AI work at scale, with our data set, and can it fit within our own operational systems and processes?

AI and the Legal Department of 2026: What’s Changing (and What’s Not)

 


Traditional infrastructure models are being re-evaluated as enterprises face rising pressures around data security, compliance requirements, cost management, and operational agility. Choosing between Build Your Cloud (BYC), SaaS, and Public Cloud deployments is now a strategic decision that shapes long-term scalability and governance.

Knovos

This blog breaks down the strengths and limitations of each model to help IT and business leaders align their deployment strategy with organizational priorities.

  • BYC (Build Your Cloud): Ideal for enterprises needing maximum data control, custom security frameworks, and strict compliance posture. Offers deep configurability but requires internal expertise and higher ownership responsibilities.
  • SaaS: Delivers ease of use, faster adoption, and reduced IT overhead. Best for teams seeking standardized functionality and predictable subscription-based costs, with lower maintenance responsibilities.
  • Public Cloud: Highly scalable and cost-efficient for dynamic workloads. However, it introduces shared responsibility challenges and requires careful attention to data residency, security controls, and vendor lock-in.

This strategic comparison provides a clear framework for identifying which model best supports your enterprise’s operational, security, and compliance needs. Whether prioritizing control, convenience, or cost efficiency, understanding these differences is crucial for long-term infrastructure success.

Read the full analysis here:
https://www.knovos.com/blog/byc-vs-saas-vs-public-cloud-deployment-a-strategic-framework-for-enterprise-decision-makers/


As legal teams increasingly adopt AI-driven tools, one concern comes up again and again:
How do we protect sensitive data without stripping it of the context that makes it useful?

For many organizations, the answer so far has been aggressive redaction or overly simplistic anonymization. While these approaches may reduce exposure, they often come at a high cost, they remove the very details that AI, analytics, and legal professionals rely on to extract value from data.

When Data Protection Breaks Legal Insight

Legal data is not just a collection of names, dates, or identifiers. Its value lies in structure, relationships, and nuance. When key elements are removed or distorted, documents lose meaning, datasets become unreliable, and AI outputs degrade quickly.

This is especially problematic in legal workflows such as:

  • Document review and investigations
  • Contract analysis and due diligence
  • Litigation analytics and case preparation
  • Training AI models on historical legal data

In these contexts, protecting privacy by destroying context is not a sustainable solution.

Preserving Meaning While Protecting Privacy

Nymiz addresses this challenge by combining advanced anonymization and redaction techniques designed specifically for legal data. Our technology transforms personal and sensitive information while preserving the structure, logic, and semantic relationships within documents and datasets.

Key capabilities include:

  • Context-aware anonymization, ensuring entities are consistently replaced across documents
  • Tokenization and structured transformations that allow patterns and relationships to remain intact
  • Support for complex legal documents, where precision and consistency are critical
  • AI-ready outputs, enabling analytics and machine learning without exposing sensitive data

This approach allows legal teams to maintain consistency and meaning across datasets, achieving an anonymization accuracy of approximately 85% in real-world environments while preserving the structure and relationships that AI and analytics depend on

Enabling Trustworthy Legal AI

AI systems are only as good as the data they’re trained on. When context is lost, results become unreliable and confidence in AI drops. By preserving meaning while protecting privacy, legal teams can trust both their data and the insights derived from it.

This makes it possible to:

  • Use real legal data for AI initiatives
  • Reduce reliance on synthetic or overly sanitized datasets
  • Improve the quality and reliability of legal analytics
  • Move faster without increasing privacy or compliance risk

Check out this video on how tokenization secures documents in real workflows.

nymiz2

Join Us at Legalweek 2026

We’re meeting with legal and security leaders during Legalweek to discuss how privacy-first collaboration can scale without adding friction or risk.

Schedule a meeting with our team before Legalweek to make the most of your time in New York.

And if you’re onsite, you’ll find us at Booth 612.