This article explores practical strategies for expanding and strengthening networks of diverse neutrals, highlighting how intentional outreach, relationship-building and greater access to opportunities can help foster a more inclusive ADR community.
Explore how flexibility, efficiency and greater control over outcomes are making mediation an increasingly valuable option for resolving disputes.
This article explores why Texas businesses are increasingly turning to mediation as an effective way to resolve disputes, highlighting its flexibility, efficiency and ability to provide greater control over outcomes.
This article explores the benefits of co-mediation and how two mediators can bring complementary perspectives, skills and experience to help parties navigate complex disputes and work toward resolution.
A Conversation with Esteemed Neutral Hon. Anna H. Demacopoulos (Ret.)
Mediation can be an incredibly useful tool to resolve cases at all phases of the litigation process. Ahead of successful mediations, neutrals and advocates alike often author and/or review pre-mediation briefs. With this in mind, it begs the question – what makes a successful pre-mediation brief?
What’s really keeping some legal teams from adopting AI?
It’s not budget. And it’s not a lack of executive support.
Among in-house legal teams that haven’t begun using or exploring AI, 56% say clearer regulatory guidance would make them more likely to start—far ahead of demonstrated ROI from peers (19%) or available budget (11%).
The takeaway: For the legal teams still on the sidelines, the most compelling AI pitch may not be a better business case. It may be a clearer legal one.
Explore what Axiom’s 2026 In-House Legal AI Report reveals about the 18% of legal teams still holding back—and what could finally move them forward.
Read the article: https://lnkd.in/eYfKmqju
Innovative Driven has been recognized by Chambers and Partners for its leading work in eDiscovery. The recognition highlights the team’s expertise in technology-driven litigation support, including AI, analytics, and technology-assisted review.
Legal technology is evolving from a support function into a strategic advantage. This article explores how AI, automation, and legal operations are reshaping the way law firms think about technology, efficiency, and the future of legal services.
Explore how smarter Microsoft 365 storage management can help organizations reduce costs, improve data governance, and optimize their cloud environment.
Bala Bharathy U
One wrong click can derail a legal matter.
A deleted document.
A corrupted version.
A ransomware attack targeting sensitive client data.
When legal teams lose access to critical documents, work stops.
Legal 360 helps ensure it never has to.
Legal 360 coverage across documents, collaboration, identity, infrastructure, and SaaS
See what resilient legal operations look like.
https://www.hycu.com/blog/introducing-legal-360-keep-matters-moving-through-disruption
UniCourt is proud to announce a groundbreaking release: judgment analytics and comparison of attorneys by key metrics such as trial experience and judgment outcomes. This new suite of analytics is a significant expansion of UniCourt DART (Docket Analytics, Research, and Tracking) and will enable legal professionals to assess case values and counsel performance based on actual trial outcomes.
Data-Driven Judgment Analytics
By leveraging UniCourt’s new judgment analytics, legal professionals can easily:
- Benchmark award metrics by viewing total damages granted and the median amount awarded for specific case types.
- Identify outcome trends to determine the likelihood of certain cases proceeding to a final judgment or verdict.
- Evaluate success rates by analyzing the proportion of judgments and verdicts resolved in favor of plaintiffs versus defendants.
- Anticipate timing by viewing the median time it takes to reach judgments and verdicts.
Advanced Attorney Comparison
By using UniCourt’s sophisticated attorney comparison tool, legal professionals can easily:
- Assess litigation experience by comparing total case counts and the number of judgments/verdicts awarded.
- Analyze win/loss records to identify attorneys with the strongest performance metrics by absolute number of judgments and verdicts won, as well as overall win percentages.
- Compare damages awarded to see the total and median amounts won.
- Conduct head-to-head comparisons between specific attorneys or opposing counsel to inform litigation strategy and counsel selection.
Users can now answer complex questions about litigation trends and attorney experience, such as:
- What’s the median jury award for a personal injury case, and is this specific jurisdiction more favorable to plaintiffs or defendants?
- How long should I expect a case to last if it goes to judgment? What if it goes to trial?
- How does my panel of attorneys compare against each other? Who is the best attorney for this case if it goes to trial?
Integration into the Litigation Knowledge Graph
These new analytics are built into UniCourt’s exclusive Litigation Knowledge Graph, which connects cases, claims, facts, and outcomes directly to the underlying documents and key players involved (attorneys, law firms, judges, and parties). This provides a comprehensive view of the crucial relationships and outcomes most relevant to any specific case.
Learn More about UniCourt’s New Judgment Analytics and Attorney Comparison
UniCourt’s new judgment analytics and attorney comparison tools are currently available for a selection of key state trial courts, with a nationwide expansion coming soon.
You can learn more about UniCourt’s platform here, see our full press release here, or contact a UniCourt Litigation Data Expert here.