Do you really know who’s looking at your most confidential data? Documents travel the globe to employees, contractors, business partners and collaborators.
That’s a lot of opportunity for leaks. WFH creates new cybersecurity hazards.
It’s impossible to lock down all those computers manually and ensure they stay that way. Answer these five questions to find out if your security posture is all it can be.
These days, it seems impossible to talk about eDiscovery or document review without mention of Technology Assisted Review (TAR). In its broadest use as a technical term, TAR can refer to virtually any manner of technical assistance – from password cracking to threading to duplicate and near-duplicate detection. In its narrower use, TAR refers to techniques that involve the use of technology to predict (or to replicate) the decision a human expert would make about the classification or category of a document. In this narrower sense, TAR often comes with a version number – TAR 1.0, TAR 2.0, and more recently, TAR 3.0. While some are inclined to advocate for the superiority of a single approach, each version has its merits and place, and understanding the underlying process and technology is crucial to selecting the right approach for a specific discovery need.
We recently authored a white paper to offer a discussion of the variables to consider when choosing the right TAR workflow for a specific matter, as well as the main principles behind different TAR solutions. By doing so, we make the claim that true preparedness lies in understanding the range of core technology within the TAR landscape, and further knowing how and where to access the right combination of people, process, and technology to meet any discovery need. If you or your team have had mixed results with TAR, or want some guidance on deciding your approach with TAR in your next matter, you may find this paper helpful.
Employment disputes are often a driver of DSAR requests: wide in scope, potentially expensive. A new ProSearch white paper offers practical tips to solve the employee DSAR challenge. #DataPrivacy
These days, it seems impossible to talk about eDiscovery or document review without mention of Technology Assisted Review (TAR). In its broadest use as a technical term, TAR can refer to virtually any manner of technical assistance – from password cracking to threading to duplicate and near-duplicate detection. In its narrower use, TAR refers to techniques that involve the use of technology to predict (or to replicate) the decision a human expert would make about the classification or category of a document. In this narrower sense, TAR often comes with a version number – TAR 1.0, TAR 2.0, and more recently, TAR 3.0. While some are inclined to advocate for the superiority of a single approach, each version has its merits and place, and understanding the underlying process and technology is crucial to selecting the right approach for a specific discovery need.
We recently authored a white paper to offer a discussion of the variables to consider when choosing the right TAR workflow for a specific matter, as well as the main principles behind different TAR solutions. By doing so, we make the claim that true preparedness lies in understanding the range of core technology within the TAR landscape, and further knowing how and where to access the right combination of people, process, and technology to meet any discovery need. If you or your team have had mixed results with TAR, or want some guidance on deciding your approach with TAR in your next matter, you may find this paper helpful.
Modern Document Management: How Law Departments Can Work Smarter. Read more.
The role of the lawyer will inevitably change over the coming years. The legal workplaces of the very near future will inevitably comprise AI, human and hybrid legal talent. As we witness the evolution of AI and its take-up in the world at large, we are likely to experience a more measured approach and gradual warming to the evolution of this technology in the legal world throughout the next few years, which will then lead to a tsunami deployment.
What does this mean for the legal market? Begin by understanding the power of this technology, and what AI can do to support you in your transitioning role and help you continue to be successful in the months and years ahead.
Download our whitepaper: https://go.imanage.com/WP-2017-08-Power-of-AI-in-Legal-BF_20-Landing-Page.html
The Class of 2020, the first crop of Generation Z to enter the legal workforce, are digital natives who grew up with technology at the center of their lives. These digital natives are leveraging their mastery of technology to drive productivity gains in the legal profession. So, what do law firms need to do to win the battle for Gen Z talent? Read the white paper to learn more.
